3 Comments
author

Hi Sue Ellen, the actual perjury Margaret Murphy committed has never been specified. It has been speculated that the 2022 perjury was related to what Judge Murphy told the grand jury about contact between Judge Murphy and a state trooper who was a witness in case back in 2004. It has been alleged that they met outside the court in McGrath. Private conversations outside the court between a judge and witness are not permitted. It has been claimed that the judge denied this in front of the 2022 grand jury, and they had other individuals that had claimed to witness the conversation. The ironic thing is that if this is true, the statue of limitations on the 2004 judicial misconduct was over by the time of the grand jury in 2022. Judge Murphy could have just admitted to the conversation, told the truth about the illegal contact in 2004, and then would have gone free. By lying to the grand jury in 2022, she committed perjury which resulted in the indictment. This is of course speculation on my part. I have heard nothing officially on the record from any individual confirming this speculation.

Expand full comment

People!..... Wake Up. Get Angry! The corrupt Judiciary has taken away your Constitutional Right to view the GJ Report they wrote on Judicial Misconduct. Matthews is out and out just hiding this report for about one year now. Why would he do this? It’s easy to figure this out. He is hiding the names of significant State officials that are complicit in this long standing corruption scandal. We The People must demand this report!

Expand full comment

I wondered from the beg8nning of this case what the actual perjury was and never got an answer from anyone...was the statement ever presented?

Expand full comment